ALL CHANGE
  • all change
    • HORSHAM
    • NATIMUK AND SURROUNDS
    • MITRE
    • GOROKE
    • EDENHOPE
    • APSLEY
    • DESIGN PROJECTS>
      • Aritz Arriola
      • Laura Binaburo Lopez
      • Luigi Bonora
      • Yvonne Chan
      • Dongyuan Chen
      • Julia Collis
      • Sarah Correa
      • Jack Crocker
      • Matt Ellis
      • Kerstin Enn
      • Lean Fouche
      • Catherine Horwill
      • David Isaacs
      • Aliya Jumabhoy Anwar Ali
      • Xuan Yi Koh
      • Michelle Lau
      • Jack Lawrence
      • James Loder
      • Soledad Lopez Domenech
      • Rachel Low
      • Natasha Maddison
      • Lachlan McArdle
      • Coline Meynent
      • Salem Nasser
      • Ben Pakulsky
      • Ana Pia
      • Alice Podner Komaromy
      • Akreety Pradhan
      • Allison Sheehan
      • Thom Shen
      • Silvio Soldi
      • Bo Sun
      • Andrej Vodstrcil
      • Jonathan Ware
      • Emma Wilson
    • SUPPORT RESEARCH STUDIES>
      • BMW Guggenheim Lab
      • Amsterdam Playgrounds
      • Passage 56 / Eco Interstice
      • The Gateway Master Plan and Welcome Centre, Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge
      • Le Lieu Unique
      • Allotment Athletica
      • Cassia Co-Op
      • Bankside Urban Forest
      • Dora Park
      • KAIT Workshop
      • The NO99 Straw Theatre
      • Min Buri Old Market Library & Klong Toey Community Lantern
      • Re connecting Robin Hood Gardens
      • Norway National Tourist Route
      • The Multifunctional Centre and the Development of the Natural Environment
      • North Duisburg Landscape Park
      • Eichbaumoper & Eichbaumboxer Raumlaborber
      • Pedra Tosca Park, Les Preses, Catalunya, Spain
      • New York City High Performance Parks and Landscape Renewal
      • Cardboard And Paper Construction
      • Revealing the Landscape Qualities: Landscape plan for Drentsche Aa River, Netherlands
      • Understanding Soil
      • Biocity: Emergent Sustainability
      • Architecture (of the Common Sense) and Sustainability
      • Sustainability in the Wimmera, Interview
      • Repositioning the Architect Article Review
      • Market Gardens
      • Creating Sustainably Productive Cities Article Review
      • Watersquares Article Review
      • Alterra Research Institute
      • Sustainability Post Copenhagen
      • Havana, Cuba
      • Estuarine Landscape of the Thames
    • EXHIBITIONS + PUBLICATIONS
  • DARC
    • DARC EXCHANGE STUDIES
  • RMIT STAFF
Picture
 Van Eyck playgrounds identified in yellow within Amsterdam during 1954 
Picture
Van Eyck playgrounds identified in yellow within Amsterdam during 1961
Picture

Drawings for climbing igloo (1956) and funnels (1957)



Picture

Drawings for climbing arch (1949)



Picture
Plan and situation of Zaanhof playground (1950)


Picture
 Zeedijk playground, Amsterdam- Centrum (1956)
Architecture Case Study by Ki Jun Lo

Amsterdam Playgrounds

Aldo van Eyck, Amsterdam Public Works Department, 1947-1978 

The street playgrounds in Amsterdam designed by Aldo van Eyck represent one of the most emblematic of architectural interventions in a pivotal time: the shift from the top-down organization of space by modern functionalist architects, towards a bottom- up architecture that literally aimed to give space to the imagination. Recognising the importance of ‘learning’ from the particularities and irregularities of left-over, insterstitial-spaces in the existing fabric of the city, this project aims to work with these spaces rather than overlook them. It is an attempt to express the genius loci of the site through its own unique configuration as all the playgrounds are site-specific, filling them with activity in response to the urban framework as a whole.

The project reused vacant plots of land and converted them into playground spaces for children. It was a regeneration of urban voids, filling them with life as a redeeming, therapeutic act of weaving together the fabric of a devastated city. This interstitial approach to the city aims to build a more active community, with at least one small public playground in every neighbourhood of Amsterdam. The playgrounds were an opportunity for van Eyck to test out his ideas on architecture, relativity and imagination, representing his exercises in non-hierarchical composition.

Approach 
The playgrounds posseseses an inherently web-like quality when perceived as a whole, represented through its approach in creating a pattern of relationships with its surrounding: the “in-between” or “interstitial” nature of the playgrounds. The design of the playgrounds is aimed at interaction with the surrounding urban tissue. Temporality of the intervention is part of this ‘in between’ nature, recreating space through incremental adaptation instead of the tabula rasa approach of modernism, where the designs had an autonomy of their own, based on abstract data and statistics. In affiliation with the Site Preparation Service of the Department of City Development who wanted to give every neighbourhood its own playground, they often had to be placed in vacant, derelict sites. The use of empty plots therefore represents a tactical solution in repurposing unused land with an ad hoc approach.

In regards to the spatial configuration of the playgrounds, the design proposes a different conception of space, one that stimulates the imagination of the users (the children). Van Eyck consciously designed the equipments in a very minimalist way, the idea being that the children could appropriate the space by it’s openness according to their own interpretation. The close relationship between van Eyck and the artists from the COBRA art movement makes it probable that much of his early inspiration for the playgrounds was derived from COBRA’s working method of spontaneity and experiment. They believed that the spontaneity of the child’s imagination, untainted by modern protocol, was one of the privileged sites of authenticity in a society where man was to live “in a morbid atmosphere of artificiality, lies and barrenness”. It is through these approach in notions that the designs for the playgrounds show great variety and authenticity at the same time through its spatial composition and quality.

Scales 
The playgrounds work across multiple scales from the national scale of Netherlands when perceived as a whole, to small-scaled interventions through the playground furniture van Eyck developed. The playgrounds forms a continuous network of places spread through the urban fabric, furnished with recurrent type-forms designed by van Eyck.

These elementary constructions with powerful simplicity in design represents an intent by van Eyck to activate the childrens imagination, rather than shutting it down by adapting the shape of imaginary animals which do not belong in the city. They then offer children the means of discovering things for themselves and develop the locomotion to which they are naturally inclined, hinting towards another possible

Program 
The design of the playgrounds incorporates the activity of the children who use it into the composition of the playground itself. As the program outlines a playground to accommodate children activity, the play equipments is an integral part of the design. Van Eyck himself designed the playground equipment, including the tumbling bars, chutes and hemispheric jungle gyms, and his children tested them, realizing its purpose to stimulate the minds of children. Children could then recognize these spaces instantly as his own territory; places that the child could identify from neighbourhood to neighbourhood as giving due recognition to his existence as a city dweller.

That being said, the hemispherical jungle gym is not just something to climb. It also represents a place to talk, as well as a lookout post. Relieved of their childish commotion, the elementary tectonic forms of the playgrounds establish public places with a distinct urban character, places that also make sense to the adult, as a respite when travelling through the city or as a rendezvous. These sandpits, tumbling bars and stepping stones are therefore placed throughout the Netherlands as part of an open space network accessible to the public, regardless of age.

How 
The compositional techniques van Eyck used to articulate the spaces within the design for the playgrounds is achieved through the establishment of a focal point that binds all its elements together. The focus, which is generally marked by the sandpit, rarely if ever coincides with the geometric centre of the site. It produces an asymmetric situation which is then brough into dynamic equilibrium by the positioning of  the other elemens. These elements - tumbling bars, stepping stones, chutes and hemispheric jungle gyms - could endlessly be recombined in differing polycentric compositions depending on the requirements of the local environment. This fixed repertiore conveys the modular character of the playground, whilst being uniquely specific to its distinct site.

Challenges and Opportunities 
Like many public infrastructure initiatives the challenge is maintaining these public fixtures to ensure a long-lasting permanence. Unfortunately this unique urban design heritage has been treated in a particularly careless way since the 1970s. Most of the playgrounds were neglected, many were subject vandalism, and demolition.

Images 
All sourced from:

Aldo van Eyck: the playgrounds and the city
Liane Lefaivre; Rudolf Herman Fuchs; Ingeborg de Roode; Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam. Netherlands, 2002

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.